Ethical Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making Essay

End-of-life decision-making entails looking into good, pagan, as easy as, legal concerns. All of the aforementioned(prenominal) has to be c atomic number 18fully considered if one has to decide to end his or her own life. This paper provide look into the ethical, cultural, and legal issues that go along with end-of-life decision-making. It in any case intends to state what therapist can contribute in his or her confederacy in the discussion of end-of-life decision making together with his or her colleagues, as well as, patients & their families. Ethical Issues obscure in End-of-Life Decision-MakingThere are ethical indispensable issues entangled in end-of-life decision-making and some are the pursual origin of all is the issue on utilitarianism, since this is said to be the foundation of morals then it is linked to the end-of-life decision-making as well (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Here, it is said that actions are functioneousness in proportion as they ten d to promote ecstasy, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Happiness here is regarded as the absence of pain and unhappiness is the presence of the aforementioned (Germino 1972, p.240). It is an issue because happiness is non all that matters in ending a life (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). In addition to that, how can one be sure that the absence of pain, which is goal in this case, will lead to happiness of the person chiefly involved in the end-of-life decision-making (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580)? The same is true with the family of main person involved, will they be experience happiness if the patient opts to end his or her life voluntarily instead of waiting for his or her natural death to take amaze (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p.580)? Second is the issue related with the Kantian model or what is technically referred to as the deontological theory (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). This states that a person has to fulfill a sealed righteousness or duty as a part of his physical object (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). This statement now seems to be irrational since the concrete definition of a function or duty is not provided (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). For example, is it the persons responsibility to subject himself or herself to death (Bennagen, 2000, p.50). It may be his or her right to choose to live or die but if asked if it is his or her responsibility remains a big question (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). Last but not least, on that point are some health safekeeping providers who are super conscious about how much money is spent on patients and how in effect it is spent (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Some individuals feel that the amount of money spent on terminally ill patients is not really worth it (Hinman, 2000, p. 9).This is highly wrong it is as if one is saying that money is far more central than actually leavening to save a life (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Cultural Issues Involved in End of Life Deci sion-Making Furthermore, there are several cultural issues involved in end-of-life decision-making as well and some are the following First of all, there are some members of a cultural minority that prefers to be verbalize to straightway with regards to the disease that they are going by dint of (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516). Although, there are as well some who do not (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). In fact some immediate family members request that they be the ones to be spoken to only since they believe that informing the patient will only defend the patient feel worse and will eventually negatively make him or her (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). The same is true when it comes to making decisions with regards to the medications/treatment that the patient will undergo some family members prefer that they be the ones to be in put about this instead of the doctor and/or the patient (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ).Second, patients who belong to a cultural gro up sometimes opt not to be directly informed about the disease he or she is going done especially if its a life-threatening one (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Third, some patients also would prefer to carry out certain religious activities and spiritual traditions so as to assist in their medical treatment, and eventually, their healing as well (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Last but not least, some patients take into consideration their beliefs and medical prognosis when it comes to the medical experts, suffering, as well as, the afterlife (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). ratified Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making There are also certain legal concerns when it comes to end-of-life decision-making Most of the States disallows physician-assisted self-annihilation for example in New York, it is unlawful under the general homicide laws (Legal situation of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n. d. , n. p. ). The same is true in Virginia wherein the re is no law that actually covers physician-assisted suicide but there is a statute which imposes civil sanctions on persons assisting in a suicide (Legal Status of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n.d. , n. p. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the Discussion of End-of-Life Decision-Making along with Colleagues There are several things that I may contribute as a therapist to my colleagues. I can share with them my cheatledge with regards to how to communicate with patients of diverse last (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). I can request them to demonstrate an interest to the patients cultural heritage for them to be able to give the patient culturally-sensitive care (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 521. ). In addition to that, I will also let them know that it is important to give the patient autonomy especially when it comes to non-disclosure of medical culture and family-centered decision-making because through the aforementioned, the patient will eventually feel that their cultural norms are being watched (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the Discussion of End-of-Life Decision-Making along Patients and their FamiliesFinally, I may also be of gravid assistance to patients and their families with regards to their discussion of end-of-life decision-making through the following 1) I will respect it if the patient prefers that his or her family members be the recipients of diagnostic and treatment information 2) I will make sure first who is the member of the family whos found to make treatment decisions before speaking to him or her or well-favored them an advice with regards to the medical procedures or treatment and 3)I will help them demote another therapist/physician in case they are ill-fitting with the current one and especially if their therapist/physician belong to the incompatible ethnic background (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). As a therapist, I will try to advise them the best I can whil e considering their cultural background, incorporating my ethical/moral standards, and making sure that I will abide by the laws as well.ReferencesBennagen, P. (2000). Social Economic and policy-making Thought. Q. C. UP Press. Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. 1991, Great Political Thinkers Plato to the President.Harcourt Brace, Forth Worth. Germino, D. 1972, Machiavelli to Marx Modern Western Political Thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Hinman, L. M. (2000). Ethical Issues in End of Life Decisions A Guide to Understanding Differences. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//ethics. sandiego. edu/presentations/sharp/index_files/v3_document. htm Legal Status of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//www. nightingalealliance. org/pdf/state_grid. pdf Searight, H. R. & Gafford, J. (2005). Cultural renewal at the End of Life Issues and Guidelines for Family Physicians. American Family Physician, 71(3), 515 522.